Template:Did you know nominations/Imperial College Central Library
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Imperial College Central Library
- ... that it took 52 years for Imperial College to get its Central Library? Source: Science for the Nation: Perspectives on the History of the Science Museum: 150–151 amongst others
- ALT1:... that the recreational reading collection at Imperial College's Central Library was started by students? Source: The History of Imperial College London, 1907-2007: 418 and IC Reporter, the Staff Newspaper of Imperial College...
- Reviewed: STIR/SHAKEN
- Comment: Article created November 22nd
Created by Shadowssettle (talk). Self-nominated at 00:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC).
- Review underway... Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 10:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
A nice new article, fully compliant with Wikipedia policies and DYK requirements (length, creation date, absence of copyvio, use of suitably reliable sources and so on). QPQ review has been done. Both hooks are verified (ALT1 is AGF verification due to no online preview); I have a slight preference for the original, but both would be suitable to run with.
- To aid verification please could you provide page numbers for the three book references, particularly for ref [3] (Gay 2007) where no Google Books preview is available. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time; I don't know why I forgot to provide them initially. I've added page numbers to both the original article and the submission (see above), with explicit rp tags to be more explicit in a couple places. I don't mind which hook is chosen, I think the wording of the first is better, but I gave ALT1 as it might be more interesting for some Shadowssettle(talk) 18:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for updating; happy to mark both hooks as verified and ready to be featured. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
